Police Actually Do Show Restraint – When They’re Facing Armed White Guys
2015/04/27 –Ā What is going on in the minds of some cops that frequently prompts empathy for armed white men but unleashes lethal fury on unarmed African-American men?
As a ceaseless flat line of tragedies snuffs out the lives of young brothers, one peculiar parallel trend emerges: For every unarmed black man who dies at the hands of white police officers, it seems as if thereās one armed white man who survives such an encounter.
In a way, that flies in the face of a popular national narrative that police officers are having some trouble restraining their trigger-happy selves. The excessive use of force by police is at the core of that discussion: Recently, for example, the Justice Department applauded the Seattle Police Departmentās implementation of mandatory āde-escalation trainingā program for new officers. The force used āmust be both reasonable and necessary,ā saidĀ Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita GuptaĀ in a statement last week. ā[T]his training will provide valuable guidance to officers when they make split-second decisions about when and how to use force.ā
The problem, however, is that we assume that cops have a restraint problem. But judging from a growing number of confrontations between police and armed white guys, itās reasonable to conclude the killings of African-American men and women may have another cause. And in the rush to a future full of body cameras, training, diversity hiring and other essential tools for modern law enforcement, we should probably find out what it takes to change that.
Going viral recently is aĀ body-cam-captured videoĀ of rookieĀ New Richmond, Ohio, cop Jesse Kidder talking down a young, armed and white 27-year-old Michael Wilcox, who is accused of killing his fiancee and best friend hours before. Wilcox challenged Kidder to āshoot me!ā
Kidder did not. He reasoned Wilcox into a peaceful arrest, earning himself all sorts of national props for showing āgreat restraint and maturity.ā And who knows? Maybe policing in the post-Ferguson, Mo., world made Kidder rethink the situation.
And maybe it didnāt. Instead, Wilcox ended up joining the pantheon of armed and dangerous white dudes who stayed alive even after police identified them as homicidal suspects on killing rampages. One unfortunate week might find us gripped in national outrage over the untimely and unjustified deaths ofĀ Freddie GrayĀ in Baltimore orĀ Eric HarrisĀ in Tulsa, Okla.; but highlighted less are numerous confrontations between cops and rather dangerous white guys with guns who have already massacred people or are about to commit domestic terrorism.
This raises deeply disturbing but necessary questions that hint at a need for more than just a āde-escalationā program:Ā What exactly is going on in the minds of some cops that frequently prompts empathy for armed white men but unleashes lethal fury on unarmed black men?Ā Ā Ā Ā
TakeĀ Eric Fein, for example, a white 31-year-old sitting comfortably in jail on charges of killing one Pennsylvania state trooper in September and wounding anotherĀ beforeĀ forcing state police into a 48-day manhunt. Or still-alive 41-year-oldĀ Ryan Giroux, a white supremacist who is accused of killing one person and injuring five in March during a shooting rampage in Mesa, Ariz. Cops finally caught up with him and took him into custody after tasing him. And letās not even get started on the jaw-dropping actions ofĀ Adam Kokesh, a gun-rights activist who not only loaded a shotgun across the street from White House grounds but also videotaped and posted the whole thing online.
Perhaps one of the more notorious armed white guys involved in mass murder isĀ James HolmesĀ of Aurora, Colo., who, even after allegedly slaughtering a dozen people and injuring 70 in a movie theater shooting in 2012, managed to survive the police response and is on trial.
In almost half of all active-shooter situations, police didnāt even kill the shooter. According to aSeptember 2013 FBI briefingĀ on a study of 160 mass-casualty, āactive shooterā incidents between 2000 and 2013, most ended once the perpetrator stopped shooting, either because he fled or took his own life.
Curiously, the FBI details every demographic, geographic and casualty-type of data in its compelling 47-page study, even telling us that only six of the shooters were female, but fails to disclose one critical shooter characteristic: race.
The Congressional Research Service, however, did some legwork for its own March 2013 paper, āPublic Mass Shootings in the United Statesā (pdf). Despite an annoying lack of data, that study did conclude that the āthe gunmen generally acted alone, were usually white and male.āĀ Of the 81 shooters in this report, 41 died by suicide and 10 at the hands of law enforcement.
Police restraint is employed frequently when officers run up against gun-carrying white dudes engaged in all forms of villainy. Yet we’ve seen unarmed and ultimately innocent black men and black women find themselves either badly hurt or dead just for looking suspicious or being in the wrong place at a particular wrong time.
Most frightening is the issue ofĀ why. Thereās never really a clear answer for that beyond our 400-year knowledge of state-sanctioned violence against African Americans. White officers, in particular, would never admit to any subconscious bias pegging black men as subhuman.
What recent studies do show is that public perceptions of black people do not help. When white people arenāt generally associating black people with criminal activity, they are viewing people of a darker hue as otherworldly. The Sentencing Projectās 2014 āRace and Punishmentā study shows that most whites support criminal punishment for blacks and Latinos because they perceive people of color as most likely to commit crimes.
Meanwhile, the Religion News Serviceās ā2012American National Election Studyā and Associated Press polling showed that most whites still harbor a view of blacks as less hardworking and less intelligent.
But an even moreĀ recent and troubling study, published in November 2014 in the journal Social, Psychological & Personality Science, appears to offer some insight. Researchers determined that white attitudes have shifted dramatically over generations, from once perceiving blacks as āthree fifths of a humanā to now being āsuperhuman.ā
Respondents in surveys were more likely to link terms such as āghost, paranormal, spirit, wizard, supernatural, magic, mysticalā to pictures of black people than they were to ascribe those qualities to whites, who were linked to more āhuman words,ā such as āperson, individual, humanity, people, civilian, mankind, citizen.ā The authors of the study worried that “[p]erhaps people assume that Blacks possess extra (i.e., superhuman) strength which enables them to endure violence more easily than other humans.ā
Perhaps, for reasons still unknown, there are white police officers who think that brothers are faster than bullets and speeding trains. Maybeāand we donāt knowāan armed white guy receives more lenience because thereās a chance he could be exercising his rights as a ācitizen.ā For now, all we have is instinct, polls and a growing list of sad stories.
Source: The Root MagazineĀ