Happy X Day? The Case Against a Federal Holiday for Malcolm X

2015/05/19 –Ā Several scholars agree that a federal holiday would sanitize the legacy of a leader who fought fearlessly against state-sanctioned violence, imperialism and white supremacy.

There has been no federal holiday designated to honor Malcolm X, and on Tuesday, on what would have been his 90th birthdayā€”in the midst of the continuedĀ devaluation of black bodiesĀ and theĀ dismissal of black truthā€”the question on some peopleā€™s minds is: Should there be?

He was born May 19, 1925, as Malcolm Little but denounced his ā€œslave nameā€ when he joined theĀ Nation of Islam in 1952. It was his rebirth as a Muslim minister and warrior for justice and human rights that shaped a generation of black revolutionaries in his image. His words onĀ police brutality, systemic racism and capitalismĀ could have been spoken this year, this month or evenĀ thisĀ day.

SomeĀ haveĀ called for the federal governmentĀ to acknowledge his prophetic brilliance and unflinching radical black love, and while I agree with the sentiment, I canā€™t help thinking ofĀ what he wroteĀ in a 1964 letter to the Egyptian Gazette less than one year before his death:

The common goal of 22 million Afro-Americans is respect as human beings, the God-given right to be a human being. Our common goal is to obtain the human rights that America has been denying us. We can never get civil rights in America until our human rights are first restored. We will never be recognized as citizens there until we are first recognized as humans.

There is no one who can convince me, asĀ state-sanctioned violence,Ā food insecurity,Ā substandard health careĀ andĀ staggering unemployment ratesĀ continue to disproportionately target black Americans, that Malcolm would want to be ā€œhonoredā€ by a country that does not first recognize and preserve the sanctity of black livesā€”or by aĀ country that has yet to acknowledgeĀ the allegedĀ role it played in his death.

ā€œI canā€™t think of anyone I know who would support [a federal holiday],ā€ saidĀ Jared Ball, an activist and associate professor of media studies at Morgan State University. ā€œItā€™s more than problematic. Itā€™s propagandistic and shameful.”

As my elders in Mississippi used to say, stop him when heā€™s lying. MyĀ resistance to symbolismĀ as a means of concealing a paucity of substance is well-documented, and I stand by my belief that we need to reassess how we view honorā€”or, more specifically, how we view being honored by the United States.

It feels as if some of us believe that we need the stamp of approval from our government to feel assured of our own humanity. I wonder why that is, when we were brought here as chattel to increase white Americaā€™s capital. I wonder why some of us feel insignificant if the same pomp and circumstance that is used to honor war criminals and slave owners and morally bankrupt colonizers and imperialistsā€”also known as U.S. presidentsā€”is not bestowed upon us. And I wonder why some of us still hope that some token gesture is the foreshadowing of systemic change that will positively impact the conditions and lived experiences of black Americans.

ā€œIt certainly behooves us to commemorate the legacy of his teachings as they persist in their potent relevance in times of state-sanctioned terror,ā€Ā Maytha Alhassen, a University of Southern California provost Ph.D. fellow and journalist, said toĀ The Root.Ā ā€œBut a Malcolm X federal holiday is about as compatible with his legacy as Harriet Tubman replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. Malcolm was the sharpest at identifying U.S.-sponsored liberal multicultural tokenism for what it was: ā€˜An integrated cup of coffee isnā€™t sufficient pay for 400 years of slave labor.ā€™

ā€œHow comfortable is the American state with the idea of educating its youth and citizenry why they have a day off of labor and school?ā€ continued Alhassen, who is also a research assistant onĀ the Malcolm X ProjectĀ and recently co-organized aĀ black social-justice delegation to Palestine. ā€œHow far would they sanitize the legacy of Malcolm to fit within the confines of liberal American triumphalism?ā€

Exactly. How would they honor him? When he is co-opted by corporations hoping to prove solidarity with African Americans, what quotes will they use? Will they talk about how he said that we ā€œcanā€™t have capitalism without racismā€? Will they talk about his vehement opposition to Zionism and its disastrous effects on Palestine, while this countryĀ remains in bed with Israel? Will they quote him onĀ police brutality, or will they cherry-pick his positions in an attempt to paint him as nonthreatening to white supremacy, when the complete opposite was true?

This country doesnā€™t broaden or diversify the narrative of our collective history in any authentic way. What weā€™ve experienced is the massaging of revolutionary legacies until they fit smoothly within a preapproved context that dilutes the power of black resistance. It is that potential for sanitization that troublesĀ Imani Perry, a professor of African-American studies at Princeton University and the author ofĀ More Beautiful and More Terrible: The Embrace and Transcendence of Racial Inequality in the U.S.

ā€œWeā€™ve seen that the manner in which black political activists and leaders have been remembered in federal celebrations has often sanitized them beyond recognition,ā€ Perry said toĀ The Root.Ā ā€œWe can look to the example of Martin Luther King Jr. and how, the last three years of his life, his critiques of imperialism and capitalism and economic domination have been erased from public memory. Once upon a time I might have easily said itā€™s meaningful simply for his significance to be acknowledged by the larger society. But now I think the distortions, which tend to serve a rather vapid conception of multiculturalism rather than anything like racial justice, are perhaps worse than the absence of recognition altogether.

ā€œOn the other hand, I do think it is meaningful for black children in particular to have multiple opportunities to encounter these important historical figures, in books, in art, in class, but also in the landscape of their country,ā€ Perry continued. ā€œUltimately, my greatest preference is for all of us who believe in freedom to continue to read and listen to Malcolm, to share him in community, beyond whatever the federal government intends to do with his legacy.ā€

Alhassen echoes Perryā€™s sentiments, pointing out that ā€œwe have collectively remembered Malcolm through our festivals in Oakland[, Calif.], on bus rides from 125th Street in Harlem to his physical resting place inĀ Ferncliff Cemetery, in ourĀ [Kendick] LamarĀ andĀ Tupac joints, and even now on our Instagram postings.ā€

The question remains, then: Is that enough? AreĀ weĀ enough? And if the answer is no, then perhaps the first step to honoring Malcolm should be learning to love ourselves enough that we donā€™t waste any time waiting on this country to love us back.

 

Source: The Root MagazineĀ 

Kirsten West SavaliĀ 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Press Release

MS NAACP opposes NCAA Tournament Hosted at Ole Miss

Click Here to Read

Follow Us on Twitter