2013/10/08 — Newly unveiled summary from the Mississippi NAACP and international labor law expert Lance Compa describes how Nissan undermines workers’ freedom of association under International Labor Organization principles

Washington, D.C. – An extensive report by Mississippi NAACP President Derrick Johnson and international labor law expert Lance Compa released in Washington, D.C. today (October 8) shows that Nissan in Canton, Miss., is in violation of international labor standards on freedom of association through its aggressive interference with workers trying to exercise their fundamental right to organize a union.

“Under international law and pursuant to its own stated commitments, Nissan is supposed to respect human rights standards on

workers’ freedom of association – the right to organize and the right to collective bargaining. But in the Canton plant, Nissan has launched an aggressive campaign of fear and intimidation to nullify these rights,” said Johnson.

“Our research shows that Nissan is not living up to the standards of worker treatment enshrined in International Labor Organization (ILO) core labor standards, UN human rights principles, and other international norms. It also belies Nissan’s own public commitments to honor international standards through its membership in the United Nations Global Compact,” said Compa, an American lawyer currently based in Europe. “Workers’ descriptions of how they are treated behind the walls of the massive Nissan plant in Canton, Miss., affirm that Nissan is systematically interfering with the internationally recognized right to form a union.”

“Workers and everyone in the Canton community are appreciative of this research on the unfair treatment of Nissan workers,” said Cong. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss). “The finding that Nissan is in violation of international labor rights standards is alarming. I and the entire Canton community continue to stand with workers in Mississippi, because they deserve the freedom to organize a union if they so choose, free from implied threats.”

The International Labor Organization’s (ILO) 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and ILO Conventions 87 and 98 are the foundation of international standards on workers’ freedom of association. They prohibit:

• Imposing pressure, instilling fear, and making threats of any kind that undermine workers’ right to freedom of association.
• Creating an atmosphere of intimidation and fear with respect to union organizing.
• Pressuring or threatening retaliatory measures against workers if they choose union representation.
• Denying reasonable access for workers to hear from union representatives inside the workplace.

Worker Jeff Moore, a body shop quality technician hired in 2001, stated that anti-union intimidation began early on. “In the first meetings, managers told us that Nissan is totally non-union and didn’t want any part of unions, that unions make plants close,” said Moore. “Everything they said about unions was negative, nothing positive. It’s like they were drilling it into our heads, stay away from the union,” said Moore.

Workers also recounted “captive audience” meetings in which they were forced to watch films and hear speeches filled with implicit threats of plant closure if they formed a union, and orchestrated one-on-one meetings with supervisors warning of dire consequences if they choose union representation.

Nissan, the report says, also targets their anti-union behavior at hundreds of “associates” or temporary workers, many of whom do the same work as regular Nissan employees but are paid lower wages and have less job security. The report concludes temporary workers, because of their tenuous situation, often feel even more susceptible to the company’s intimidation and climate of fear if they support a union.

The report’s authors say call on Nissan to change its practices, specifically:

• Affirm workers’ right to organize in keeping with the core labor standards of the ILO and ILO Convention 87 on freedom of association.
• Make clear that Nissan will not close the plant or fail to introduce new product lines because workers choose union representation.
• Assure workers that if they choose representation, Nissan will negotiate in good faith with a sincere desire to reach a collective bargaining agreement; and
• Grant access to UAW representatives so that employees can receive information from them inside the workplace.

The report also recommends that socially responsible investment firms “ … re-evaluate their portfolio holdings of Nissan stock in light of ILO standards and the company’s actions at the Canton plant, and engage with Nissan management to encourage adoption of the recommendations in this report” and that “ … The United Nations Global Compact and the OECD … consider whether the company’s actions in Canton are consistent with its commitments to, and obligations under, international labor standards.”

Nissan recognizes and bargains with unions at almost all of its operations globally, but not in the U.S. Nissan workers and their supporters want Nissan to change how it treats workers, including:

• Stopping the anti-union campaign at its U.S. operations and treating workers with dignity and respect. Allowing union supporters equal time to address employees on the issue of union representation. Apologizing and retracting past statements that imply the future of the plants would be at stake if workers choose union representation.
• Providing permanent jobs for all temporary workers and paying these workers the same as it does its regular employees.

 Sign up for updates and download the full or abridge report:

[wp_email_capture_form listid=’1′ template=’1′ displayerror=’yes’ submittext=”]